Presented at: 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2006)
by Aldo Gangemi, Carola Gatenacci, Massimiliano Ciaramita, Jos Lehmann
Webpage: http://www.springerlink.com/content/v14758l28k763018/?p=aadcf74709094232b99f452d6c4630a5We present a comprehensive approach to ontology evaluation and validation, which have become a crucial problem for the development of semantic technologies. Existing evaluation methods are integrated into one sigle framework by means of a formal model. This model consists, firstly, of a meta-ontology called O2, that characterises ontologies as semiotic objects. Based on O2 and an analysis of existing methodologies, we identify three main types of measures for evaluation: structural measures, that are typical of ontologies represented as graphs; functional measures, that are related to the intended use of an ontology and of its components; and usability-profiling measures, that depend on the level of annotation of the considered ontology. The meta-ontology is then complemented with an ontology of ontology validation called oQual, which provides the means to devise the best set of criteria for choosing an ontology over others in the context of a given project. Finally, we provide a small example of how to apply oQual-derived criteria to a validation case.
Modeling Ontology Evaluation was presented at this event.
Resource URI on the dog food server: http://data.semanticweb.org/conference/eswc/2006/paper/gangemi-catenacci
Same as: http://www.eswc2006.org/full-papers/#gangemi-catenacci
Explore this resource elsewhere: